MEPACQ

Presentation

MÉPACQ, the Mouvement d’éducation populaire et d’action communautaire du Québec, is a national, multi-sectoral movement working for social transformation from a social justice perspective. It is made up of 11 regional tables in autonomous popular education (ÉPA) that bring together 333 autonomous popular and community groups.

The MÉPACQ was born out of the desire of popular groups to group together around the concept of the ÉPA. These groups, with the support of the ICÉA, formed the Comité de coordination des OVEP du Québec in 1973. It was at one of these general meetings that the current definition of PAS was adopted, as was the option of extending an organizational model based on regional tables to the whole of Quebec. In 1981, this committee became the MÉPACQ.

Objective

The primary objective of the Movement is to work for social transformation from a perspective of social justice.

Means

The preferred means of achieving this objective is autonomous popular education (APE).

Fields of action

This commitment to social transformation through PAA practices is mainly reflected in two major fields of action that are inseparable from each other:

1- Getting involved in social struggles by :

  • supporting social struggles led by other social actors;
  • participating in social struggles with other social actors;
  • initiating or carrying out social struggles autonomously;
  • equipping themselves to advance social struggles.

2- Work on the recognition, funding and development of autonomous popular education in order to :

  • to enable grassroots groups to wage social struggles;
  • prevent the financing of popular and community groups from encouraging the disengagement of the State;
  • that state recognition and funding respects our societal project;
  • to be equipped in our self-directed popular education practices.

Orientation

Guidance is provided by the Movement as a whole, i.e. the grassroots groups, the Regional Tables and the national coordination.

The MEPACQ builds various animation tools, including animation guides: “social justice, climate justice”, “to fight racism, let’s act! “Why strike at the community level? » …. Available on the MEPACQ website: http://www.mepacq.qc.ca/category/education-populaire-luttes-sociales/outils-depa/

MÉPACQ | info@mepacq.qc.ca | ADRESSE | 1600, avenue De Lorimier Bureau 274 Montréal (Québec) H2K 3W5 | CONTACT | Tel. 514-843-3236

image_pdfTélécharger au format PDF
Posted in Members associations, Non classé, North America, The Americas and Caribbean

Freedom Award 2020 : Take part in the vote!

Young people from around the world elect the 2020 Personality for the Freedom Award from among the following three personalities:

Loujain Al Hathloul, Saudi Arabian women’s rights activist in her country.

Père Pedro Opaka, for his fight against extreme poverty in Madagascar.

Nasrin Sotoudeh, Iranian lawyer specialising in the defence of human rights and fundamental freedoms

This selection was made from 238 proposals submitted by young people of 13 nationalities (Burkina Faso, Egypt, Madagascar, Togo, Colombia, Canada, United States, Cambodia, India, Lebanon, Spain, Ireland, France). For more information and to participate in the vote : cliquez ici

image_pdfTélécharger au format PDF
Posted in Non classé

Cultures and migrations

The way we look at new education and its values today cannot put aside a part of our history that saw the rise of support for peace movements at the dawn of the 20th century, nourished by humanist and egalitarian values.

To introduce my remarks, I refer to the history of Ficeméa with an excerpt from Marcel Hicter’s speech on the occasion of his taking office as President of the International Federation of Ceméa in 1971 in Paris.

“Culture is not knowledge or scholarship; it is an attitude, a willingness to surpass oneself, one’s body, heart and mind, in order to understand one’s situation in the world and to influence one’s destiny. This is the priority that we give to the more being over the more having. »

For an international federation that is part of the new education movement, culture in its broadest sense is at the heart of the political project that we defend in our work with young people, adults and especially migrants.

Thus, Ficeméa endorses the definition of culture, in the anthropological sense of the term, as defined by UNESCO:

“Culture, in its broadest sense, is considered to be the set of distinctive spiritual and material, intellectual and emotional features that characterize a society, a social group or an individual. Subordinate to nature, it encompasses the environment, the arts and humanities, lifestyles, fundamental human rights, value systems, traditions, beliefs and sciences. »

The challenge is to reinvest culture as a vector of individual and collective meaning and its function of “making society”. Indeed, culture as we understand it in the Ceméa is an activity that creates meaning, supports the construction of imagination that is conducive to the development of creativity and brings social cohesion.

New education movements allow the active participation of the population – and of the whole population – in artistic creation and not only in cultural consumption.

The cultural activities proposed by Ficeméa members for migrants are essential for :

To form and think of culture as an experience of transformation of reality.
Develop the projects of the person who feeds on a collective.
To inscribe a pedagogy of invention, experimentation, in contact with reality.
Make your own knowledge.

Thus, collective artistic creation is a lever for expression, participation, individual and collective emancipation and thus societal change.

At the European level, we have identified three projects that are emblematic of our approach:

Ceméa France, summer 2018: Cultural support project during the Avignon festival for unaccompanied minors or, as they define themselves, “peace seekers”.

EXTRACT SOUND CREATION here

It is divided into 3 parts: a first interview with Alpha at the beginning of the stay, then excerpts from the work on Thomas Joly’s play Thyeste and finally, Alpha’s testimony at the end of the stay.

This stay allowed:

To organize the access, participation and presence in cultural and artistic life of people who are particularly distant from these areas because of their status.

To value the individual and collective history of each person.

To legitimize these “peace seekers” in the respect of their cultural rights, to propose a rich, common space of socialization.

To allow them to distance themselves, to breathe in a hard daily life, exhausting physically and psychologically.

And thus enhance their capacities, their personalities and the importance of intercultural links.

Vagabond Mirror: Alpha-Theatre project

VIDEO EXTRACT, 2 min

 

Alpha courses are mainly attended by asylum seekers.

Once a year, two weeks of theatre are offered to the 130 learners participating in literacy classes.

The action takes place in several phases:

It begins with playful exercises that build confidence, connect people, and make them want to engage in theatrical practice.

Then gradually, images/photos are constructed from words, feelings and small pieces of text are introduced.

Then, dialogues are learned little by little, taking the time to explain them and being concerned about the comprehension of the texts by the whole group. This work is one of the most important and is based on collective ownership.

Particular attention is paid to the play/mirror of words, the echo of words and their repetition. To promote understanding, words are brought into play by emotion.

Finally, all the pieces of the puzzle are brought together to give a coherent and complete representation. Trainers, learners, families and friends, residents of asylum seekers’ centres, alpha trainers and the local population are invited to attend the representation.

For Le Miroir Vagabond, the theatre is a vector of social link: it allows the inhabitants of a commune to share a moment of theatre with asylum seekers: negative images fade away, a priori and fears fall and we can thus consider the beginning of this notion of making society in the same territory.

By expressing themselves theatrically, by having the opportunity to communicate in French with others and by being valued at the time of the public performance, learners develop personally, create social ties and mobilize in their life course thanks to the confidence in their potential that they have acquired during this training.

Italian Federation of Cemea, Interculturalism: a training for teachers

Teachers want to provide everyone with access to better learning conditions. This road to autonomy is part of an adaptation of content to people in learning situations. Indeed, active education is part of participatory learning processes: teachers offer content that makes sense in an environment and allows the person to experience, understand and empower themselves.

The purpose of teacher training is to increase their ability to understand students’ experiences in order to identify difficulties in their learning context. This approach allows teachers to constantly question their practices.

FIT has created a training module for teachers working in Italian language literacy courses. Based on Paul Klee’s theory of form, the idea is to work on the sounds of a language in comparison with the perception of colours and shapes.

The workshop proposes to teachers a research around colors and abstract images related to the writing of the alphabet and sounds of the Chinese language, thus placing teachers in a situation of learning a new language. This pedagogical approach allowed us to reflect on the problem of language learning; that is, the decoding of sounds in the chaos of language in order to better understand it.

According to the RETE SCUOLAE MIGRANTI teacher network, it is as fundamental to understand as it is to learn a language. The approach is different from learning a classical language. Indeed, a migration project and its motivation have an impact on the methodology. This pedagogy proposes that the elements of learning should be objectives and not foundations. More info by clicking on the link here.

To conclude my remarks, I would like to highlight that the question of migration invites us, in reference to Édouard Glissant, to move beyond confining assignments and think about our identities in relation to the other, to the whole world in this co-presence of universes, imaginaries, spaces and times. And in this way, we can converge our struggles, make the one and the plural.

Sonia Chebbi

image_pdfTélécharger au format PDF
Posted in Non classé Tagged with:

European Social Meetings from 12 to 15 December 2018

thumbnail of PROGRAMME-RES-ANGLAIS-SONIA-OK

 

 

 

 

 

To view the entire program, click on the image or here

image_pdfTélécharger au format PDF
Posted in Events, FICEMEA Tagged with:

European Social Meetings from 12 to 15 December 2018

thumbnail of PROGRAMME-RES-ANGLAIS-SONIA-OK

To view the entire program, click on the image or here

image_pdfTélécharger au format PDF
Posted in Events, FICEMEA Tagged with:

Conference on Post-Growth at the European Parliament, September 2018 – Challenges and Prospects

Questionning the dogma of growth, which has become incompatible with the human and ecological wellbeing

 

The historic conference held in the European Parliament in Brussels on ‘post-growth’ revealed the clash around the crucial question: is it possible to decouple CO2 emissions from economic growth rates and to continue indefinitely the march towards a ‘Green Growth’?

A historic conference was held on 18 and 19 September at the European Parliament in Brussels, on “post-growth”, bringing together scientists, politicians and decision-makers. The event was organized by members of Parliament from five different political parties, together with trade unions and NGOs, and aimed to explore the possibility of a “post-growth economy” in Europe. The conference was preceded by a seminar on ‘degrowth’ organized by the Université Libre de Bruxelles, which brought together scientists from all over Europe involved in research around degrowth. We have followed these four days of debate representing Polis association.

What has impressed us is the journey of this notion, marginal so far, which has succeeded in penetrating the hard core of institutional and decision-making circles, until becoming an object to be debated at the level of the European Parliament. The opening of the conference by Mrs Vestager, European Commissioner for Competition, is significant of the importance that European institutions are beginning to give to this notion.

At the same time, the debate clearly showed that the concept of degrowth is no longer a concept marking an ideological stance, but an operational concept. In this regard, several researchers have presented research carried out all over Europe and up to the United States (within the MIT), with concrete proposals on the implementation of degrowth initiatives at the economic level.

To give some examples, the presentations included studies on governance and post-growth policy making, case studies on Transition Movements (in Sweden, the Netherlands and elsewhere), developments in the area of municipal sufficiency policies, initiatives on circular economy and zero waste policies, initiatives in urban and transport planning, research for alternatives to GDP and for Corporate and Social Responsibility instruments and reporting standards, research on ecological footprint leading to proposals for a Sustainable Consumption, as well as proposals for cooperation, collective action in view of the establishment of an open horizontal organisation of the degrowth movement.

On the occasion of the conference an appeal to the European institutions was launched, signed by 200 university scientists, and published in the media of 16 European countries [in English, in ‘the Guardian’]: <https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/16/the-eu-needs-a-stability-and-wellbeing-pact-not-more-growth>]: “For the past seven decades, GDP growth has stood as the primary economic objective of European nations. But as our economies have grown, so has our negative impact on the environment. We are now exceeding the safe operating space for humanity on this planet, and there is no sign that economic activity is being decoupled from resource use or pollution at anything like the scale required. Today, solving social problems within European nations does not require more growth. It requires a fairer distribution of the income and wealth that we already have.”

We felt during and after the conference that two languages were being spoken and that two opposing views were competing. The representatives of the European Commission were talking about Green Growth and were convinced that a decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth rates is possible. On the other hand, the Degrowth movement (basically, represented by people and institutions gathered around the call of the Université Libre de Bruxelles) was arguing for the opposite. It quickly became clear that concrete measures and details of a post-growth society cannot be clarified if the fundamental question of decoupling is not resolved.

To find out more, consult the work of the group ‘Research and Degrowth’, an academic association dedicated to research, training, and awareness on degrowth: <https://degrowth.org/>

Yolanda Ziaka

image_pdfTélécharger au format PDF
Posted in Europa, Greece, Members associations

The philosophical principles Ficeméa draws upon

« Nobody teaches anybody else, or themselves, people teach each other using the world around them.»

Paolo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed

Introduction

Ficeméa is a movement of activists working in educational, cultural and social organisations. These organisations take action in their respective fields thanks to committed activists. Member associations work with a wide range of audiences from multiple fields to organise and carry out educational action based upon new education principles. Ficeméa members take part in development and defend against social conquests

The philosophical foundations for new education were thought up in a very different political and historical climate. Pedagogical thinkers and activists from diverse countries with very different existences have given them a universal dimension. In defending its principles new education transcends social context and reality, social classes and the question of national belonging.

New education can only be thought about from an international perspective placing humanism at the heart of its politics. This values freedom of initiative, creativity, expression, emotional well being and self-development both in one’s relationships and the wider environment.

Our approach to education creates situations in which everybody – child, young person, adult – can become more conscious of his or her environment, take ownership of it and participate in change and transformation. This, in a spirit of individual, collective and social progress.

New education, in theory and in practice, plays its part in transforming society and influencing relations of power and force, organisational structures and individual freedom. This is a move towards more equality and greater individual and collective power.

New education, which aims to give everybody the ability to become emancipated, can only be brought to life from a political viewpoint.

Empancipation is understood in terms of an individual’s life but remains inseparable from a collective sense of empancipation and that of social transformation towards wider equality.

Only applying this logic to one pedagogical approach will only satisfy those that uphold more traditional educational objectives. It is, by its nature, ‘subversive’ in the sense that it tends to make society more equal and fair.

The foundations that new education can be built upon draw on ideas of freedom and political concepts that have their basis in secularism and are enriched by our own thinking. These ensure we remain open towards other people and that there is respect for tolerance and diversity of thought.

The four pillars of new education

Environment creates a person. Experience and activity are a product of owning one’s private and public narratives. Drawing upon one’s individual and collective journeys enables an individual to develop an active self, empowered to act in the world.

The environment 

This draws upon Henri Wallon’s wide concept of environment and its social, biological and ideological impact. Environment plays a key role in education and creates the possibility for a person and/or a group to own his/her environment and to transform it.

Playing an active part in one’s environment is obligatory. All ‘remote learning’ is to be banned.

Only an in-depth knowledge of one’s living environment can lead to a person’s fulfilment within it, both individually and collectively. A person’s surroundings must encourage and enable action.

Environment is a combination of history and the geographic and social territory in which a person acts and is able to exert power. Human beings are in a constant dynamic with other actors who exert different forms of power (political, institutional, social, cutural, economic, legal…) Different actors’ real and effective participation enables the individual and his/her community to create meaning together centred upon inclusion, empowerment and the development of notions of public and private.

A person’s position

A person is seen as having a history, background, needs and wishes and is seen as able to make his/her own decisions. All beings can pursue and make progress along their personal path with the support of others. Knowledge is not really acuired without personal development and therefore self-knowledge.

Recognising a person as an individual and paying attention to and respecting his or her personal responsibility (which is not to be confused with an individualistic approach) is essential. Notions of choice and planning should not be removed from those of freedom, which have also fed into new education.

That is a basic principle of new education. It is a founding principle. Today Ficemea’s work on acceptance, otherness, benevolence and welfare feeds into that, whether it’s in a social, cutural, philosophical or cultural context. We also need to take back the idea of trust, which contributes towards benevolence and adds depth to it.

Collective life 

Taking part in collective life is considered a self-development tool that contributes towards empancipation. New education is based upon this dialectic between individual and collective – between singular and plural.

We prosper when we are part of a collective framework that emancipates and allows each and every one of us to create a reality that is constantly changing and moving towards greater freedom (without that being an empty word). Individual choices should feed into the collective, without being manipulated or annihilated.

Underpinning these notions is the question of an individual’s social positioning within groups, whether these positions are taken, allocated, granted or gained.

Activities

Activities and experimentation are fundamental to any education work. Activities are an essential part of staff training. They enable culture to be acquired as an experience of reality-based transformation.

Activity must run through all of our practices, whatever the theme, field or stakes. But these activities must retain, or even build upon, the individual’s own projects which are built around and fed by the collective energy; activities are based around pedagogy that is rooted in invention and reality-based experimentation.

Now, the stakes are even higher where activities are concerned: they touch upon self-development and the repercussions that can have on the transformational power of groups. There’s an almost urgent need to bring back learning through doing, to symbolically hold children and young people’s hands so that they can better access knowledge by making it themselves

 

Active education methods

Training plays a central role in sharing active education methods.

A trainer’s skills don’t stop at the relaying of information alone but extend to his or her ability to run with original approaches. Approaches that can then be managed and developed into a new ways of understanding.

Our ambition in terms of training is to support social actors as they reflect upon their experience of the world: to remove stereotypes from this and to develop fluid educational practices. These practices are to be constantly reworked and questioned, moving beyond routines and best practice and adding an element of surprise.

During the training process one’s experience of the world is transformed. People are required to develop cultural references, question their existing ones and to reinvent others. Migrants experience the same process. The training relationship must enable the transition between these states. All training therefore creates an intercultural space.

Active education is a process that allows each person to develop their behaviour and skills and to broaden their knowledge. This is a constant and ongoing process, a lifelong journey. Education fundamentally revolves around personal experience within a collective heritage which is constantly changing (living environment, family, society, world)

As we see it the purpose of education must be that of training emancipated, responsible, critical citizens who stand together:

  • An empancipated citizen is one that is able to consider stereotypes and come to his/her own conclusions, to act in his environment and to make the most of his/her potential

  • A responsible, critical citizen is able to participate in society’s evolution through his/her own aspirations and values in the context of social progress.

This conception rejects an instrumentalisation of education that

– trains economic, cultural or political agents to conform with the needs of a system,

– standardises consumer behaviour for market economy, or any other political model with the same objectives.

image_pdfTélécharger au format PDF
Posted in Philosophical principles, Progressive education

Theatre is a human education process

Dear Friends of Theatre and Education,

I am from India, which is a prominent country in south Asian region of the world. India is a country of illiterates, villagers and poor people who are rich in cultural expressions, practical adoption in livelihood and self-dependant life. That is how theatre has existed as a tradition for since more than 300 years of forms, which are still visible. The only complete theatre guidebook has been written in 3rd Century BC named Natya Sashtra. So the existence of theatre in India can be imagined much before that on which basis this classical theories have been derived.

The necessity of inventing theatre was felt as an essential of human life, for which it could sustain by itself undergoing many different improvisations after facing challenges time to time. The necessities could be explained as – a) Theatre is a social reflection process by highlights social conflicts, through an entertainment method to go for an improvement in our society and human life. Conflict between the protagonist and antagonist and at last, by giving a win point for ‘good’ forces against the ‘bad’, establishes the purpose of Theatre. b) Theatre is an expression with a sense of beauty for researching, creating and sharing the artistic achievements, which claims to be an entertainment for building peace and eternal happiness. So ultimately theatre is a social educational process to initiate a thinking of improvement, beyond the students inside classrooms. And Education aims at the same goal : To improve the Human Life and society.

Further when analysing the elements and benefit of theatre : one can discover that –Theatre improves confidence, clarity in vocabulary, sense of logical thinking, power of social-analysis, spirit of teamwork, communication skills etc.  The content of a play always sensitizes the political, social, psychological angle of our lives. These are the basic need of a Human Life.

Natya Chetana has developed 2 modules of theatre process and form. 1) Cyco theatre and 2) Intimate Theatre. One is to carry theatre by cycle crossing hundreds of kilometers to reach common audiences of villages who are out of educational premises and performing in open air spaces facing 3 side audiences after undertaking a serious research on subject and cultural expression of the region. The second model is to do longer plays, 1 hr 15 min to 2 hours maximum, performing once in the evenings with a series of shows for urban population in towns using auditoriums, non-auditorium unusual spaces addressing One-sided audiences. The objective is to draw attention of the audiences towards the issues dealt in the content, but places before them through a familiar entertaining method.

Natya Chetana has record of results:  Audiences sit down and discuss for a change. Silent poor people start raising their voices against antagonists. Children start questioning teachers in their schools. Natya Chetana conducted a special project in 1994-1996, to make tribal students confident and become interested in education. As a successful indicator, the poor people decided to continue the Children Theatre Centres of their villages by own contribution after the withdrawal of Natya Chetana from that region. The private tuition by school teachers was vanishing there.

That is how Natya Chetana believes Theatre as an integrated part of Education which improves Human Life. Nobel prize(1913) winner Rabindranath Tagore (as a poet) established the same believe through his institution at Shantiniketan during 1913 onwards. But this believe turned down by the modern school system and theatre became side tracked for which Natya Chetana is worried about. The present concept of Theatre in Education is a new idea for present day schools in India.

Subodh Patnaik, Director- Natya Chetana

image_pdfTélécharger au format PDF
Posted in India, Indian Ocean, Members associations

UNESCO: Global Citizenship Education – Topics and learning objectives

This publication is the first pedagogical guidance from UNESCO on global citizenship education. It is the result of an extensive research and consultation process with experts from different parts of the world. This guidance draws on the UNESCO publication “Global Citizenship Education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century” and the outcomes of three key UNESCO events on global citizenship education.

This publication is available here: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002329/232993e.pdf

image_pdfTélécharger au format PDF
Posted in Human rights, Thematic resources

Feedback from the Francophonie Summit

By Ficeméa

26 and 27 November 2016 will be remembered as a major victory for supporters of high-quality public education. At the summit in Madagascar, the 57 Member States of the International Organisation of La Francophonie adopted the Antananarivo Declaration which explicitly refers to the the problems associated with the commodification of education. This is the strongest statement ever made by heads of State against  commodification and in support of public education and regulation. It is a sign that efforts by civil society actors to raise awareness on the matter amongst State representatives and international bodies have been successful. It also shows how important all of our joint efforts in recent months have been.

The declaration included the following paragraph  “Recognising the development of commercial schools and educational institutes and supporting high-quality public education provided free of charge to everyone, we call upon the IOF and the  Conference of Ministers for Education in the States and governments of the Francophonie (Confémen), in cooperation with civil society, to continue the discussions started at the Kinshasa Summit (2012) and to take measures to promote effective institutional mechanisms for regulating private actors in the education sector in order to guarantee the quality and fairness of education services.”

Whilst the fact that so many Heads of State expressed such a clear position on the issue is an important step in itself, it is now essential that national authorities are held accountable for the implementation of this declaration.

Commodification of education – a multifaceted process

In recent years, the international community has witnessed unprecedented growth in the role of private actors in the education sector, with the result that education systems have been totally transformed in both the “South” and in the “North”. This also includes actors offering low-cost, poor quality services which target emerging and poor countries. Many investors, and multinational companies in particular, are involved on a large scale in the highly lucrative education “market”. The commodification of education is an insidious process that takes various forms and impacts both the formal and non-formal education sectors. It results in business ventures offering academic support, study coaches, ready-made “kits” for coping with dyslexia or dysorthographia, “educational” digital software etc.

This multifaceted phenomenon impacts the quality of educational content and knowledge acquisition. It leads to segregation between different areas of countries and different socio-economic groups, further widening social inequalities. As a result, it puts the right to education itself at risk.

The commodification of education is defined as the transformation of education into a profitable commodity. There are two types of commodification. First, the privatization of education, which is defined as increased control of the education sector by private actors. Secondly, it entails privatization of the educational methods used, i.e. the introduction of methods and approaches used in the private sector into the public education system.

Three major consequences can be identified:

  • Basic education becomes inaccessible and social inequalities are widened. A recent study[1] by Solidarité Laïque and the Global Initiative for Economic Social and Cultural Rights, in partnership with associations in Haiti, including the Ceméa Haiti, analyses the situation in a country where 84% of schools are private schools:  “Policies on access to education have not been the  much hoped-for catalyst for equal opportunities, but rather have helped further widen the inequalities that already existed.” One of the reasons for these inequalities is the cost of enrolment, which mainly affects the poorest households as it constantly increases. According to 62% of households, these excessively high costs and other financial barriers are the main reason that children aged between 3 and 16 years are not sent to school. More than 90% of Haitian households also said that they either did not have or barely had sufficient resources to cover their basic needs, which means that children’s education is in jeopardy. »
  • Standardization of teaching methods. For example, the number of ‘Low Cost Schools’ is growing. Bridge International Academies Ltd (BIA) is a US-based profit-making company. It is the largest private business school chain in the world. Bridge International Academy schools are funded by Pearson, the Bill Gates Foundation and Facebook. These ‘low cost schools’ have been set up in Liberia (20 schools), Kenya (400 schools) and Uganda (63 schools). The concept is based on two keywords: rationalization by economies of scale and standardization. The Bridge Academy has designed teaching tools linked to lessons read out by the “teacher” from a tablet. The teacher becomes a simple ‘coach’ who is given a class after five weeks of training. The same content is taught in the same way in all schools at the same time. The Ugandan government has taken legal action to close Bridge schools because they did not meet minimum teaching standards.  However, the company still hopes to reach 10 million students by 2025.
  • Replacement of public funding (national and international) by partnerships granted to private companies which are more focussed on profit targets than educating the population. Let’s take the partnership between the Ministry of Education in France and Microsoft as an example. Since the financial stakes are high, the big digital companies – GAFAM (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft) in particular – try everything they can to impose their standards and their products, not only in terms of the equipment schools use but also, and above all, through teaching practices.

Combatting this commodification is a major challenge for all involved in defending the right to education for all, throughout life.

The statement by the IOF against commodification – a joint response at international level and a tool for advocacy

It is in this worrying context that a group of non-governmental organizations, trade unions, researchers and educational movements, including the Fédération Internationale des Ceméa, have created an international consortium to reflect on and take action on this issue. These actors are coordinating research and advocacy activities and also working on a methodology to identify the impact of privatization on human rights.

The Francophone members of this consortium have written a joint appeal from civil society that speaks out against the commodification of education and education systems. The text aims to alert public authorities and civil society actors to the issue and to raise their awareness of the inherent dangers connected with this process of commodification of education. It also urges them to take action to counter this process.

Today, our Appeal Against the Commodification of Education was signed by 302 civil society organizations from 38 countries.

This appeal now needs to be passed on, heard and debated. States, regional institutions such as the European Union and the African Union must, like the UN[2] and the IOF, protect and boost education as a genuine public good, and promote a vision of education as a driving force for individual, collective and social empowerment.

At national level, we have to call upon the various ministries in every country to take action, mobilize actors involved in educational matters and make proposals because the solutions exist.

We are able to link the local and international levels that are at play in our democracies. International policy guidelines should not be controlled by experts and technocrats alone. They are part of the public debate and must not be disconnected from everyday realities. Our role as actors on the ground and educators is to work with people on these fundamental issues. We must enable citizens to take ownership of national, regional and international policies in order to participate in the debate, understand the issue and be able to act on the policies that shape the future of our societies.

Education is not a commodity it is a right! We want every individual to be able to exercise it.

Sonia Chebbi,

Permanent Delegate at the International Federation of Centers for Training in Active Education Methods (Ficeméa)

___________________________________________________________

The mission of the International Organization of La Francophonie (IOF) is to embody the active solidarity between its 84 member states and governments (58 members and 26 observers). It is a community that shares the same destiny and is conscious of the links and potential that come from sharing a language, French, and universal values.

The IOF aims to improve the living standards of its populations by helping them to become actors in their own development. It provides member states with support to develop or consolidate policies and implements international policy and multilateral cooperation activities, in accordance with the four main missions adopted at the Francophonie Summit:

  • • promote the French language and cultural and linguistic diversity;
  • · promote peace, democracy, and human rights;
  • • support education, training, higher education, and research;
  • Develop cooperation activities that support sustainable development

 

[1] Study [in French] entitled Haïti, enseignement privatisé, droit à l’éducation bafoué [Haiti, privatized education, right to education ignored], an alternative report supported by 10 Haitian and international organizations published on the occasion of the Universal Periodic Review of Haiti in November 2016.
[2][2] In a resolution adopted  by the Human Rights Council in July 2016, the United Nations urges States to “address[..] any    negative    impacts    of    the commercialization  of  education”.
image_pdfTélécharger au format PDF
Posted in Commercialization of education, In the media